A new 50-state survey of redistricting released by Common Cause favorably contrasts the work of the Maryland Citizens Redistricting Commission with that of the competing panel set up by the legislature to draw districts.
In an account for Maryland Matters, Bryan Sears quotes Dan Vicuña, national redistricting director for Common Cause: “‘Maryland is an unusual case,’ said Vicuña. ‘…Having a governor of a different party produce less partisan maps did play somewhat of a role in the outcome of writing some options for a court when congressional maps were struck down as a violation of the state constitution.’” That’s interesting because it draws a direct line from the work of our commission to the later court review, culminating in an impressive decision by Judge Lynne Battaglia, that was to result in the adoption of an alternative plan with fairer, less partisan and more compact Congressional districts.
The Common Cause report can be read here (see p. 42). Among highlights:
Advocates noted that the governor’s commission managed to draw more majority-minority districts than the legislature did.
[They also] noted that while there were marked improvements in transparency and engagement in the legislative redistricting process over the 2011 redistricting cycle, the state legislature still drew lines largely behind closed doors, whereas the governor’s advisory commission had public deliberations as they drew maps. Therefore, although both the state legislature and the governor’s commission took public input across the state, the map-drawing by the state legislature that was ultimately adopted was not done publicly. The state legislature also gave very short notice to the public about when their hearings were taking place, provided minimal public education and information dissemination, and provided the public with no justification as to how their maps were drawn and no details on who worked with them to draw their maps.
The report also includes a memorable quote from Joanne Antoine of Common Cause Maryland about the General Assembly’s speedy adoption of the insider-drawn maps: “People are disengaged because they know their feedback will receive very little consideration… Common Cause MD is taking no position because the outcome is preordained.”
That preordained result was alas to govern the state’s adoption of legislative districts, even as thanks to Judge Battaglia’s courageous decision the revision of Congressional districts was to be placed on a better path.